Post-election maps

November 7th, 2004 by konrad Leave a reply »

Having seen one US post-election map too many, I finally rea­li­zed what I so very much dis­li­ked about them — the color-coded maps showing all that red give a dis­tor­ted view of the electorate.

Area is not the inte­res­ting fac­tor, popu­la­tion den­sity is. It’s true that the US map looks fairly red, lea­ding to the con­clu­sion that an over­whel­ming majo­rity of the US citi­zens voted Bush.

This isn’t so.

It’s just spar­sely popu­la­ted states.

Michael Gast­ner has been doing rese­arch in dis­to­ring maps accor­ding to dif­fe­rent fac­tors; his home­page cur­rently pro­min­ently fea­tures a map of the US that evens out the popu­la­tion. And then, sud­denly, it’s a lot more even.

Thank you, Erich for dis­cus­sing this with me and of course for poin­ting out Michael Gast­ner to me.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply