Coming home from two weeks abroad and some idle time to think, I have a few more topics to blog about.
One of them is one of the things I consider one of the most obscene forms of ripoff the mobile phone carriers do is „data roaming.“ If you want to bring your smartphone online, what they do is they do not let you easily use their own data network, but rather insist on transporting your IP traffic over their own networks to your home provider where it then is allowed to hit the public internet.
What is this?
Let me just use the local network, I don’t care where the transit into IP world happens. This would be so much cheaper, and any decent phone can handle the configuration. Heck, I did this years ago with my Treo!
Archive for September, 2010
Data Roaming?
September 17th, 2010Be afraid. Be very afraid.
September 16th, 2010It is a widely held belief that Steve Jobs is a man to transform industries. He’s done it before, and I think he (with his company Apple) has set his eyes to do it yet again. This time, it’s telephony. And I can’t blame him, it is a god-awful industry we (as a species, globally) are putting up with.
Take the epitome of modern phone technology: the mobile phone network. We’re still using phone numbers (a technology that is a century old and was optimized for the rotary phones and their electromechanical counterparts in the switching system), we’re basically using a network designed to deliver billable events and we’re communicating with voice quality that is actually more than awful.
Enter FaceTime.
FaceTime takes the telephone conversation out of the old phone network and puts it onto an IP network. It makes communication easy and fun. And it’s no longer just tied to the iPhone (which the carriers probably would have liked), but also going to IP-only devices: iPod touch and all iPads. Apple usually is known for delivering good user experience, so phone calls are good for the user.
But now, Apple is setting out to be not just the media centre of the world (with music and video already going their way), but the new phone system, too. Between the new Apple TV and FaceTime, I do have some ideas why Apple needs a new data center …
[EDITED] I do not think that the video telephony is what makes FaceTime so particularly important or game-changing. I think it is the seamlessness in which the phone and IP network interact. Ultimately, reducing the phone carriers just to another form of data carriers. I do know that Skype also works suitably well and has a good installed base. But what is different here is that FaceTime is automatically installed on every iOS device, and integrated well with the entire Apple experience (think: Address book, MobileMe, …)
Lessons in customer support
September 11th, 2010I — probably along with many, many others of the iPhone Twitter App — discovered something that I consider a bug. As soon as you rotate the phone, your position in your timeline is utterly garbled. Where you are after turning has no resemblance whatsoever to where you were before. That means: Take the phone, rotate it, rotate it back and you’re at a completely different place than before.
This quite goes against the law of least surprise for the user. So I tried to inform Twitter of that bug. I searched for a place for such feedback, did indeed file the report and included what I take to be a start on how to resolve the issue. I received an answer from Twitter a few days later, but with something that I consider to be completely beside the point. The answer, basically was, „If this is a problem for you, you can rotation-lock your phone.“ Come on, Twitter. You can do better than that. If the mail back had at least included something like „Thank you for reporting your concern, we will look at this internally“ or „Thank you, we will consider how to best deal with the issue for a future release,“ all would have been well. But to be told that this is a non-issue is, to be honest, most disappointing. And yes, I do indeed consider this to be a problem. And no, I do not consider rotation-lockng the phone an appropriate solution. (I do tend to type on the landscape keyboard, but read on the portrait orientation, so I do in fact quite like to change the direction of the phone.
And it would have been easy to not make me frustrated about this, too.
Mailman problems
September 1st, 2010For one of lists, one of the subscribers had the strangest problem. He kept getting bounces that the list alias does not even exist, whilst at the same time other subscribers could well write to that list. It turns out that his mail server was rewriting the To:-address, resolving the CNAME of the hostname that is responsible for running the lists. As we run a virtual-domain based mail server, this was not a smart choice: Whilst the email address does indeed exist on the CNAME-d host (lists.xiqit.de), it does not exist on the fully qualified name the server listens to. So we added an MX record for the hostname that also points to the ‚primary‘ name of the server (the one which the RDNS also resolves to), and now all is well. HIs email does reach the list.
