I am not a bowl.

Thoughts on Kintsugi as a parable for human development.

If you take part in the wider wes­tern cul­tu­re, I am sure you are awa­re of Kint­su­gi, the tra­di­tio­nal japa­ne­se tech­ni­que of repair of cera­mics or por­ce­lain with a gold-infu­sed lac­quer. Of cour­se, being a japa­ne­se craft, there’s way more in it—it being a part of a reac­tion to a spe­ci­fic trend in japa­ne­se socie­ty of its time, and then a skill that has been refi­ned over quite a while, as the Jape­n­e­se do. But that is not whe­re we need to be going.
Pic­tures of Kint­su­gi-fixed bowls have beco­me ico­ni­cal­ly syn­ony­mous with men­tal health or per­so­nal heal­ing. And I feel that this para­ble is off, in more ways then one.
For one, there’s the objec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on. I am not a bowl. I am not an immo­bi­le object, wai­ting to be fil­led by some­thing else. I am not a pie­ce of pot­tery, shaped for a spe­ci­fic purpose.
Ano­ther way in which I am not a bowl is this: I do not shat­ter like one. Neither my body, nor my psy­che, nor my soul. The phy­si­cal aspect being gla­rin­gly obvious, let’s look at the men­tal one. We do know that seve­re ear­ly child­hood abu­se may, in fact, cau­se the psy­che to shat­ter and split up in dif­fe­rent parts. Sci­ence calls that Dis­so­cia­ti­ve Iden­ti­ty Dis­or­der. For tho­se so affec­ted, it makes life com­pli­ca­ted to navi­ga­te and the­re is no real, relia­ble therapy.
And that’s ano­ther aspect that so irks me: the magi­cal thinking.
For a shat­te­red psy­che, the­re is no gold lac­quer that you can app­ly to the edges to glue them back tog­e­ther. In the­ra­py, nobo­dy comes with fairy dust and makes it all be good again. Peo­p­le have to do the work them­sel­ves. The­ra­py, as we know it, only has a chan­ce of alle­via­ting issues when the per­son see­king it under­stands the the­ra­pist to be a gui­de, a com­pa­n­ion, but not the one to pro­vi­de the sought-after relief.
And then, there’s the point about vani­ty. When the human body—and one could argue, the human psyche—suffer wounds, what we deve­lop are new con­nec­tions: scars. They are dif­fe­rent from the sur­roun­ding tis­sue. They are, often, quite obvious­ly dif­fe­rent and reco­gnizable as scars. Peo­p­le often say they remind them of spe­ci­fic events or on how to chan­ge their beha­viour. But their pur­po­se is not to make us func­tion­al again. To bring us back, in many ways, to be as useful as before—and in quite some cases, we just are not as befo­re. But one things scars cer­tain­ly aren’t: Gol­den. They are not ugly by them­sel­ves, eit­her. But they are not some­thing to be stan­ding out, high­light­ing the places that we were woun­ded. They just are part of us. They do not defi­ne us, eit­her. More often than not, peo­p­le don’t want to see them high­ligh­ted or descri­bed as a spe­cial fea­ture of theirs.
Com­pa­ring men­tal health and Kint­su­gi, to me, feels like lazy thin­king. Using some­thing that feels ali­gned, but never real­ly thin­king deep­ly about it. And the iro­ny about that is that so much of Japa­ne­se cul­tu­re is about being mindful, and making sure things are done pro­per­ly. So even in this way, the para­ble is being untrue to the sto­ry that it tells.


Beitrag veröffentlicht

in

von

Schlagwörter: